Uncovering the truth

Welcome to TrumpNewsInternational's Investigations page, dedicated to bringing you in-depth analyses and uncovering crucial information. Our goal is to shed light on important issues, providing our readers with the knowledge they need to stay informed and engaged.

Epstein files contain new photo of former prince Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor

Washington, D.C. — The U.S. Department of Justice has released thousands of documents as part of its ongoing investigation into the late sex offender and financier Jeffrey Epstein, shedding new light on individuals connected to Epstein’s network. Among the revelations is an image featuring Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the former prince, sparking renewed public and legal scrutiny.

The recently released files, which arrived just hours before a Congress-mandated deadline, include a photograph showing Mr Mountbatten-Windsor in a casual setting. The image depicts him lying across the laps of five seated individuals, with his head positioned near a woman’s legs. Standing behind the group is Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s close associate and convicted sex trafficker, who appears to be smiling and looking down at Mr Mountbatten-Windsor. The photo, undated and taken from a framed picture, does not specify where it was captured. The faces of six other individuals in the photo have been redacted, leaving only Maxwell and Mr Mountbatten-Windsor identifiable.

The release of this photograph is part of a broader document dump that aims to shed light on Epstein’s extensive network. The files have garnered significant attention, especially given Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s previous association with Epstein and the allegations linked to him.

Allegations and Repercussions

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the second son of Queen Elizabeth II, has long faced scrutiny over his friendship with Epstein. In October, King Charles stripped him of his royal titles and expelled him from his royal residence amid renewed allegations of sexual misconduct. Virginia Roberts Giuffre, a woman who accused Epstein of trafficking minors, alleged that she was forced to have sex with Mr Mountbatten-Windsor when she was a teenager on Epstein’s private island. Mr Mountbatten-Windsor has vehemently denied the allegations, asserting he has never met Ms Giuffre.

In 2022, he settled a civil lawsuit with Ms Giuffre, though he has maintained his innocence and stated he was not involved in any wrongdoing. The newly released photograph does not appear to provide definitive evidence regarding the allegations but has intensified public interest.

Ongoing Investigation and Future Disclosures

The full scope of Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s involvement in the Epstein files remains unclear, as the complete trove of documents has yet to be made public. A bill passed by Congress last month mandated that all files be released by a specified deadline. However, U.S. Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche announced that the Justice Department was still redacting sensitive information, with "several hundred thousand more" documents expected to be released over the coming weeks.

Critics have accused the department of failing to fully comply with the transparency order, citing delays and heavily redacted files. The initial batch also included mentions or images of high-profile figures such as Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, and Mick Jagger.

Congressional Inquiry and Future Questions

Former prince Andrew was summoned by a U.S. congressional panel last month to testify about Epstein’s operations and his own connections to Epstein’s network. However, he did not meet the November 20 deadline to respond. The committee announced its intention to investigate “allegations of abuse by Mountbatten-Windsor” and to seek further information about Epstein’s associates.

While Congress has the authority to subpoena witnesses within the United States, it cannot compel foreign nationals, leaving Mr Mountbatten-Windsor in a position where his cooperation remains voluntary.

As the investigation continues and more documents are released, public attention remains focused on the extent of Mr Mountbatten-Windsor’s involvement and the broader implications for those connected to Epstein’s illicit activities.

Epstein Files Shift Focus to Bill Clinton Amid Political War

The release of thousands of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein investigation has reignited political tensions in Washington, with the spotlight now increasingly on former President Bill Clinton. The files, made public by the U.S. Department of Justice on Friday, include numerous photographs of Clinton in the company of Epstein and his associates, prompting sharp reactions from both sides of the aisle.

The documents, issued under a law signed by President Donald Trump last month, feature images showing Clinton alongside Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted accomplice. Among the most circulated images is a photograph of Clinton relaxing in a hot tub with a woman whose face has been blacked out. The images depict Clinton aboard Epstein’s private planes, in pools with Maxwell, and in various social settings, fueling accusations from critics who argue they suggest a close relationship between the former president and Epstein’s circle.

President Trump’s supporters quickly seized on the photographs, framing them as evidence of Democratic hypocrisy. On social media, right-wing commentators highlighted the images to suggest Clinton’s involvement with Epstein was more extensive than publicly acknowledged. The New York Post ran a front-page story featuring a photo of Clinton in a hot tub, accompanied by the headline, “Bill has some explaining to do.”

“Tubba Bubba,” the tabloid’s nickname for Clinton, also published a story questioning his ties to Epstein, claiming that the documents show him “skinny dipping with a pedophile.” Critics on the right argued that the timing of the release was politically motivated, aiming to tarnish Clinton’s reputation ahead of future investigations.

The White House responded defensively, with spokesperson Abigail Jackson suggesting the photos were a distraction. “We did see something,” she posted on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, “just not what you wanted.” Clinton’s aides dismissed the images as a diversion, accusing the Department of Justice of releasing redacted and incomplete records to shield the former president from scrutiny.

Democrats, meanwhile, criticized the Justice Department for failing to release the full set of documents. Many pointed out that large portions of the files remain heavily redacted, with some reports entirely blacked out. California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff called for an inquiry into what he termed “wilful violation of the law” by Attorney General William Barr’s successor, Merrick Garland, arguing that the public deserves full transparency.

Clinton is not the only prominent figure featured in the files. Other photographs show celebrities such as Michael Jackson, Mick Jagger, Richard Branson, and actor Kevin Spacey, as well as figures from the British royal family, including Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, the Queen’s second son. One image shows Clinton aboard a plane with Jackson, with Diana Ross nearby, while another depicts him in a swimming pool with Maxwell.

Though the photographs do not necessarily imply wrongdoing, they have been widely circulated on conservative news websites and social media, where critics argue they point to a pattern of associations with Epstein that warrants further investigation.

Clinton’s deputy chief of staff, Clinton Ureña, defended the former president, stating that he was among those who “knew nothing and cut ties before Epstein’s crimes came to light.” He added, “Everyone, especially MAGA supporters, expects answers, not scapegoats.”

As the debate over the files continues, questions remain about what additional revelations may emerge in the coming weeks and how they could impact the political landscape ahead of upcoming elections. The Justice Department has announced that more documents will be released, though critics remain skeptical about the transparency and completeness of the current disclosures.

Deport Egyptian extremist who called Brits 'monkeys', say Tories - as red-faced Keir Starmer says he was unaware of 'abhorrent' posts calling for 'death of Zionists'

The Conservative Party has demanded the UK government deport Alaa Abd El-Fattah, an Egyptian-British activist, following the emergence of a series of inflammatory and xenophobic social media posts. The posts, which include support for violence against Zionists and British police, have ignited a political firestorm amid growing concerns over the activist’s views.

Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, has called for El-Fattah’s citizenship to be revoked, describing his online comments as “abhorrent.” El-Fattah, who recently returned to the UK after spending more than a decade in Egyptian detention, has faced intense scrutiny since the posts came to light.

Return and Controversy

El-Fattah was released from Egyptian custody in September 2025, after years of detention, and arrived in London on Friday. His return was celebrated by his family and welcomed by government officials, including Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy and Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper, who described his release as a “top priority” for the UK government.

However, the celebration was short-lived. Evidence of El-Fattah’s social media activity, circulating online, revealed posts advocating violence and expressing hostility towards Jews, Zionists, and British authorities. Among the most shocking messages was one stating, “I consider killing any colonialists and especially Zionists heroic, we need to kill more of them,” and another claiming, “There was no genocide against Jews by the Nazis – after all, many Jews are left.”

He also wrote, “Police are not human, they don’t have rights, we should just kill them all,” and during the 2011 London riots, he posted: “Go burn the city or Downing Street or hunt police you fools.”

Backlash and Political Fallout

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faced criticism after initially expressing “delight” at El-Fattah’s return, a stance many viewed as tone-deaf given the activist’s social media history. Sunak was compelled to row back, clarifying that he was unaware of the posts at the time. The opposition seized the opportunity to condemn what they called “dangerous complacency.”

The Foreign Office issued a statement condemning El-Fattah’s tweets, calling them “abhorrent” and reaffirming that he remains a British citizen. The government also reiterated its long-standing efforts to secure his release and reunite him with his family.

Conservative figures, including Kemi Badenoch and Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick, have called for El-Fattah’s citizenship to be revoked and for him to be deported to Egypt or another country. Jenrick, speaking to the BBC, said, “He should never have been granted citizenship in 2021, and now we must act to revoke it.”

Concerns Over Online Extremism

The revelations have prompted anger from Jewish community leaders and human rights advocates. The Board of Deputies of British Jews expressed alarm over El-Fattah’s online history, urging the government to investigate whether he still holds the views expressed publicly. They warned that such rhetoric “poses a threat to community safety” and called for urgent action.

El-Fattah, 44, wrote most of the posts between 2010 and 2011; some have since been deleted. His comments include calls for violence, denial of the Holocaust, and inflammatory remarks during the London riots.

A Divisive Figure

El-Fattah’s case underscores the complex debates surrounding citizenship, free speech, and national security. While many see him as a political prisoner and a symbol of human rights struggle, critics argue that his online activity reveals dangerous extremist views incompatible with UK values.

The government’s response is likely to intensify as opposition parties push for clarity on whether El-Fattah still holds these views and what steps will be taken to address his social media history. Meanwhile, the controversy raises broader questions about the vetting process for naturalized citizens and the limits of free expression in the digital age.

Delving into fraud scandals

Our investigations aim to uncover the truth behind significant fraud scandals, providing the public with a clear understanding of the facts. We focus on delivering accurate, objective reporting, allowing our readers to form their own informed opinions. Our commitment is to transparency and accountability in our investigative journalism.

Informing the public

Our investigations are designed to reach the general public, providing essential information to keep them informed. We strive to deliver content that empowers our audience, enabling them to understand complex issues and participate in informed discussions within their communities. We measure success not just by readership, but by the level of understanding we foster in our audience.

Inspiring informed action

We hope our investigations will inspire informed action and positive change within our audience and community. By uncovering the facts and presenting them clearly, we aim to empower individuals to make informed decisions and advocate for positive developments. We believe that an informed public is essential for a healthy democracy. Our success is measured by the impact our investigations have on public awareness and community engagement.

Create Your Own Website With Webador